Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091270›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Human and animal skin identified by palaeoproteomics in Scythian leather objects from Ukraine.

Luise Ørsted Brandt, Meaghan Mackie, Marina Daragan, Matthew J Collins, Margarita Gleba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luise Ørsted BrandtThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9777-0356
Meaghan MackieThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0763-7592
Marina DaraganInstitute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Matthew J CollinsThe Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4226-5501
Margarita GlebaDipartimento dei Beni Culturali, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7729-7795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leather was one of the most important materials of nomadic Scythians, used for clothing, shoes, and quivers, amongst other objects. However, our knowledge regarding the specific animal species used in Scythian leather production remains limited. In this first systematic study, we used palaeoproteomics methods to analyse the species in 45 samples of leather and two fur objects recovered from 18 burials excavated at 14 different Scythian sites in southern Ukraine. Our results demonstrate that Scythians primarily used domesticated species such as sheep, goat, cattle, and horse for the production of leather, while the furs were made of wild animals such as fox, squirrel and feline species. The surprise discovery is the presence of two human skin samples, which for the first time provide direct evidence of the ancient Greek historian Herodotus' claim that Scythians used the skin of their dead enemies to manufacture leather trophy items, such as quiver covers. We argue that leather manufacture is not incompatible with a nomadic lifestyle and that Scythians possessed sophisticated leather production technologies that ensured stable supply of this essential material.

Indexed as

Animals, WildSkinAnimalsCatsCattleGoatsHorsesHumansSheepShoesUkraine

Identifiers

PMID38091270
PMCPMC10718408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.