Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091211›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Are anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies effective in treating migraine aura? A pilot prospective observational cohort study.

Simone Braca, Angelo Miele, Antonio Stornaiuolo, Gennaro Cretella, Roberto De Simone, Cinzia Valeria Russo

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simone BracaDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Angelo MieleDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Antonio StornaiuoloDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Gennaro CretellaDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Roberto De SimoneDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Cinzia Valeria RussoDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University Federico II, Naples, Italy. cinziavaleria@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0345-8319
Federico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbout 15% to one third of migraineurs experience aura symptoms. Aura is a reversible focal neurological phenomenon involving visual, sensory, speech, and motor symptoms that usually precede migraine pain. Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin-related peptide (anti- CGRP mAbs) are effective in preventing chronic and episodic migraine, but little is known about their effectiveness on specifically preventing migraine with aura.

methodsThis is a pilot prospective observational cohort study, aiming at evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Erenumab, Fremanezumab or Galcanezumab for the treatment of migraine aura. We enrolled 14 patients at the Headache Centre of University Federico II of Naples. Duration of follow-up was 12 months. We assessed mean monthly days with aura symptoms, with or without subsequent headache, as well as mean monthly days with headache and mean monthly MIDAS score, by reviewing standardized paper patient headache diaries every three months.

resultsA significant decrease in mean monthly aura days was observed throughout the observation period (median baseline: 13, interquartile range: 4-16; after 12 months: 1, interquartile range: 0-3, p < 0.001). We observed a statistically significant decrease in mean monthly headache days as well (median baseline 21, interquartile range: 16-30; after 12 months: 5, interquartile range: 4-7, p < 0.001). During the 12-month treatment period, none of the 14 patients reported mild or serious adverse events.

conclusionOur findings suggest that anti-CGRP mAbs are highly effective in migraine with aura, both in reducing mean monthly aura days and mean monthly days with headache.

Indexed as

EpilepsyMigraine DisordersMigraine with AuraAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHeadacheHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideAuraCGRPCortical spreading depressionCSDMigraineMonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

PMID38091211
OpenAlexW4389682410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.