ArticleAnatomical science international2024
Anatomic variation of a duplicated uterine artery.
Article in Anatomical science international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
During the anatomical dissection of the pelvis, a duplication of the uterine artery was identified unilaterally on the left side in a 59-year-old Korean female cadaver. The first uterine artery was found to arise directly from the anterior division of the internal iliac artery and supply the upper uterine body and tube. The second uterine artery shared a common stem with the superior and inferior vesical arteries, supplying the lower uterine body. The external diameter of each uterine artery at its origin on the left side was smaller than that of the right uterine artery. One vaginal artery was identified to arise from the left internal pudendal artery. Embryologically, a duplicated uterine artery could imply the presence of two primordial arteries separately supplying the cranial and caudal parts of the Müllerian duct during the early fetal period. This case of variational anatomy is noteworthy: clinicians could elucidate it and successfully perform uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy with minimal complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.