ArticleDiscover oncology2023
High pre-chemoradiotherapy pan-immune-inflammation value levels predict worse outcomes in patients with stage IIIB/C non-small-cell lung cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pan-immune-inflammation value in lung cancer: prognostic significance and implications for therapeutic guidance - a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Association between pan-immune-inflammation value and prognosis in lung cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Clinical and pathological indicators for predicting disease-free survival after radical surgery in elderly patients with early-stage triple-negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Pretreatment Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Corrected Prognostic Nutritional Index for 24-Month Recurrence Risk Stratification After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Stage III Endometrial Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of pan-immune-inflammation in breast cancer patients with lymph node metastasis and neoadjuvant therapy.Medicine · 2025Observational
- The prognostic importance of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Prognostic impact of pan-immune inflammation value in small-cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic Value of Novel CARWL Score in Stage IIIC Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.Canadian respiratory journal · 2024Article
- Prognostic and Predictive Value of Pan-Immune Inflammation Value in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Therapy.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesWe explored the prognostic usefulness of the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) in patients with stage IIIB/C non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS AND PATIENTS: For all patients, the PIV was calculated using platelet (P), monocyte (M), neutrophil (N), and lymphocyte (L) measures obtained on the first day of CCRT: PIV = P × M × N ÷ L. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, we searched for the existence of an ideal cutoff that may partition patients into two groups with unique progression-free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results. The primary endpoint of this retrospective cohort research was to determine whether there were any significant relationships between pretreatment PIV measures and post-CCRT OS outcomes.
resultsThe present research included a total of 807 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients. According to ROC curve analysis, the ideal PIV cutoff was 516 [area under the curve (AUC): 67.7%; sensitivity: 66.4%; specificity: 66.1%], which divided the whole cohort into two: low PIV (L-PIV: PIV < 516; N = 436) and high PIV (H-PIV: PIV ≥ 516; N = 371). The comparisons between the PIV groups indicated that either the median PFS (9.2 vs. 13.4 months; P < 0.001) or OS (16.7 vs. 32.7 months; P < 0.001) durations in the H-PIV group were substantially inferior to their L-PIV counterpart. Apart from the H-PIV (P < 0.001), the N
conclusionsThe findings of this hypothesis-generating retrospective analysis claimed that the novel PIV was an independent and steadfast predictor of PFS and OS in stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.