Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091168›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2023

90Y SPECT scatter estimation and voxel dosimetry in radioembolization using a unified deep learning framework.

Yixuan Jia, Zongyu Li, Azadeh Akhavanallaf, Jeffrey A Fessler, Yuni K Dewaraja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. CT-free attenuation and Monte-Carlo based scatter correction-guided quantitativeEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yixuan JiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 4125 EECS Bldg., 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jiayx@umich.edu.
Zongyu LiDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 4125 EECS Bldg., 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Azadeh AkhavanallafDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey A FesslerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Michigan, 4125 EECS Bldg., 1301 Beal Ave., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Yuni K DewarajaDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Imaging and Dosimetry of Yttrium-90 for Personalized Cancer TreatmentR01EB022075 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DEWARAJA, YUNI K · 2016 to 2023
$4.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose90Y SPECT-based dosimetry following radioembolization (RE) in liver malignancies is challenging due to the inherent scatter and the poor spatial resolution of bremsstrahlung SPECT. This study explores a deep-learning-based absorbed dose-rate estimation method for 90Y that mitigates the impact of poor SPECT image quality on dosimetry and the accuracy-efficiency trade-off of Monte Carlo (MC)-based scatter estimation and voxel dosimetry methods.

methodsOur unified framework consists of three stages: convolutional neural network (CNN)-based bremsstrahlung scatter estimation, SPECT reconstruction with scatter correction (SC) and absorbed dose-rate map generation with a residual learning network (DblurDoseNet). The input to the framework is the measured SPECT projections and CT, and the output is the absorbed dose-rate map. For training and testing under realistic conditions, we generated a series of virtual patient phantom activity/density maps from post-therapy images of patients treated with 90Y-RE at our clinic. To train the scatter estimation network, we use the scatter projections for phantoms generated from MC simulation as the ground truth (GT). To train the dosimetry network, we use MC dose-rate maps generated directly from the activity/density maps of phantoms as the GT (Phantom + MC Dose). We compared performance of our framework (SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet) and MC dosimetry (SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose) using normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) relative to GT.

resultsWhen testing on virtual patient phantoms, our CNN predicted scatter projections had NRMSE of 4.0% ± 0.7% on average. For the SPECT reconstruction with CNN SC, we observed a significant improvement on NRMSE (9.2% ± 1.7%), compared to reconstructions with no SC (149.5% ± 31.2%). In terms of virtual patient dose-rate estimation, SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet had a NMAE of 8.6% ± 5.7% and 5.4% ± 4.8% in lesions and healthy livers, respectively; compared to 24.0% ± 6.1% and 17.7% ± 2.1% for SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose. In patient dose-rate maps, though no GT was available, we observed sharper lesion boundaries and increased lesion-to-background ratios with our framework. For a typical patient data set, the trained networks took ~ 1 s to generate the scatter estimate and ~ 20 s to generate the dose-rate map (matrix size: 512 × 512 × 194) on a single GPU (NVIDIA V100).

conclusionOur deep learning framework, trained using true activity/density maps, has the potential to outperform non-learning voxel dosimetry methods such as MC that are dependent on SPECT image quality. Across comprehensive testing and evaluations on multiple targeted lesions and healthy livers in virtual patients, our proposed deep learning framework demonstrated higher (66% on average in terms of NMAE) estimation accuracy than the current "gold-standard" MC method. The enhanced computing speed with our framework without sacrificing accuracy is highly relevant for clinical dosimetry following 90Y-RE.

Indexed as

90YDeep learningDosimetryRadioembolizationScatter correctionSPECT

Identifiers

PMID38091168
PMCPMC10719178
OpenAlexW4389678649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.