Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091109›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery: implementation is still beneficial despite modern surgical and anesthetic care.

Julian Süsstrunk, Remo Mijnssen, Marco von Strauss, Beat Peter Müller, Alexander Wilhelm, Daniel C Steinemann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05773248 (Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05773248 completednot on this map

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program in Colorectal Surgery: the Benefits of Late Adoption

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2023 to 2023Enrolled456ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms, Colorectal DisordersArmsERAS protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Postoperative outcomes following prehabilitationWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian SüsstrunkClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. j.suesstrunk@gmail.com.
Remo MijnssenMedical Faculty, University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland.
Marco von StraussClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Beat Peter MüllerClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexander WilhelmClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel C SteinemannClarunis, Department of Visceral Surgery, University Centre for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown beneficial outcomes in the last 20 years. Nevertheless, simultaneously implemented technical improvements such as minimally invasive access or modified anesthesia care may play a crucial role in optimizing patient outcome. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of ERAS implementation in a highly specialized colorectal center.

methodsThis is a propensity score matched single-center study comparing the short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in a society-indepedent ERAS program from January 2021 to August 2022 to standard perioperative care from January 2019 to December 2020.

resultsFour hundred fifty-six patients were included in the propensity score matched analysis with 228 patients per group (ERAS vs. standard care). Minimally invasive access was used in 80.2% vs. 77.6% (p = 0.88), and there were 16.6% vs. 18.8% (p = 0.92) rectal procedures in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. Major complications occurred in 10.1% vs. 11.4% (p = 0.65) and anastomotic leakage demanding operative revision in 2.2% vs. 2.6% (p = 0.68) in the ERAS and standard care group, respectively. ERAS lead to a lower number of non-surgical complications compared to standard care (57 vs. 79; p = 0.02). Mean length of stay (LOS) and mean costs per case were lower in ERAS compared to standard care (9.2 ± 5.6 days vs. 12.7 ± 7.4 days, p < 0.01; costs 33,727 ± 15,883 USD vs. 40,309 ± 29,738 USD, p < 0.01).

conclusionThe implementation of an ERAS protocol may lead to a reduction of LOS, costs, and a lower number of non-surgical complications even in a highly specialized colorectal unit using modern surgical and anesthetic care. ( ClinialTrials.gov number NCT05773248).

Indexed as

AnestheticsColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal SurgeryEnhanced Recovery After SurgeryHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsAnestheticsColorectal surgeryERASLength of stayPerioperative management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.