Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38091090›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Outcomes of metachronous para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Oluwatobi O Onafowokan, Jennifer Redfern, Agastya Patel, Thomas Satyadas, Minas Baltatzis

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Oluwatobi O OnafowokanDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. tonafowokan7@doctors.org.uk.
Jennifer RedfernDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Agastya PatelDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Thomas SatyadasDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Minas BaltatzisDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance, Stott Ln, Salford, M6 8HD, UK.
University of Manchester · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

aimPara-aortic lymph node metastasis associated with colorectal cancer is a very rare occurrence, but at the same time an important predictor of survival. Despite its importance, there is still no gold standard management strategy, particularly for lymph nodes detected during follow-up, after resection of the primary tumour. Therefore, this review was undertaken to examine the evidence available on the surgical and non-surgical management of metachronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis (m-PALNM) in colorectal cancer treatment.

methodsThis is a systematic review using the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome and study strategy. The literature search was undertaken using Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases with the following MeSH terms: lymph node excision, para-aortic lymph node, metastasis, metachronous and colorectal neoplasms.

resultsFive original papers met the study criteria including 188 patients in total (55.3% male, 44.7% female). Surgical resection of the m-PALND was the management of choice in 64% of patients. Reporting styles on survival outcomes were heterogeneous. However, patients undergoing surgical management for m-PALNM had longer disease-free survival and overall survival rates.

conclusionThere is significant paucity in the evidence available on the management of m-PALNM. However, the evidence reported by this review suggests that surgical management should be considered whenever possible, with the aim of prolonging survival. Future randomised trials are needed in order to provide further high-level evidence on m-PALNM management.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleRetrospective StudiesColorectal neoplasmsLymph node excisionMetachronousMetastasisPara-aortic lymph node

Identifiers

PMID38091090
PMCPMC10719135
OpenAlexW4389683669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.