ArticleJAMA surgery2024
Medical Students' Perspectives on Family Planning and Impact on Specialty Choice.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the Gap Between Parental Leave Policy and Practice.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers to pregnancy and parenthood during urology residency across Europe.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Physician Work Patterns in Pregnancy, Parental Leave, and Return to the Workforce.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Family collective agency in career decision-making among medical and dental students: a qualitative intersectional study in Peshawar, Pakistan.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Elective fertility preservation among graduate medical trainees: a survey study of perceived barriers and the impact of employer-sponsored financial benefits.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Influence of Reproductive Health Policy on West Texas Medical Students' Specialty and Residency Choices.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2025Article
- Parental Leave in Neurosurgery: A US Cross-Sectional Study.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Specialty choices among new generation of doctors - insights from a Polish survey study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Policies to better support childbearing surgeons.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024Article
- Resident and Fellow Perspectives on Family Planning and Building During Training.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Transforming Perceptions: The Impact of a Formal Parental Leave Policy on Surgical Trainees.Journal of surgical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Physicians are known to delay childbearing compared with nonphysicians and to experience higher rates of age-related pregnancy complications. Delay of childbearing is more pronounced in surgical specialties, and family planning and building goals may influence specialty choice. Objective: To assess medical students' perspectives on the development of family planning goals and the timing of family building within a medical career to elucidate how these perceptions impact their choice of specialty. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study included fourth-year medical students at the University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and was conducted between May and August 2021. Participants were purposively sampled to maximize diversity of gender and specialty choice. Interviews were conducted via videoconferencing software that were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and verified for accuracy. Thematic analysis was completed independently by 2 researchers and consensus on final themes was reached through discussion among study investigators. Data were analyzed between September and December 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Participants were asked to share their perceptions of personal family planning goals, support currently in place, family planning education in medicine and factors contributing to their choice of specialty and program. Thematic analysis was completed. Results: A total of 34 fourth-year medical students (median [range] age, 26 [24-33] years; 23 females [67.6%]) were interviewed. Four main themes were identified: (1) there is no ideal time to family build in a medical career, (2) family planning is a taboo topic, (3) surgical specialties offer less support for family building, and (4) residents who have children are perceived to place a burden on their colleagues. Medical students considered their family planning while deliberating among specialty choices and their experiences were highly influential in shaping their specialty selection. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this qualitative study suggest that medical students perceive that family building during training may have unfavorable implications for team dynamics and relationships with colleagues, and these perceptions may affect specialty choice and family planning goals. Integration of family planning discussions and support for family building into medical curricula is needed along with efforts to improve culture by supporting team dynamics and workload when students take parental leave.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.