Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090878›Full record

ArticleRNA biology2024

Unraveling C-to-U RNA editing events from direct RNA sequencing.

Adriano Fonzino, Caterina Manzari, Paola Spadavecchia, Uday Munagala, Serena Torrini, Silvestro Conticello, Graziano Pesole, Ernesto Picardi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Two codes of RNA editing by deamination in human diseases.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriano FonzinoDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Caterina ManzariDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Paola SpadavecchiaDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Uday MunagalaCore Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Serena TorriniCore Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Silvestro ConticelloCore Research Laboratory, ISPRO, Florence, Italy.
Graziano PesoleDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Ernesto PicardiDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITExpro (United Kingdom) · GBConsorzio Interuniversitario per le Biotecnologie · ITIstituto di Fisiologia Clinica · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, RNA editing events involve the conversion of adenosine (A) in inosine (I) by ADAR enzymes or the hydrolytic deamination of cytosine (C) in uracil (U) by the APOBEC family of enzymes, mostly APOBEC1. RNA editing has a plethora of biological functions, and its deregulation has been associated with various human disorders. While the large-scale detection of A-to-I is quite straightforward using the Illumina RNAseq technology, the identification of C-to-U events is a non-trivial task. This difficulty arises from the rarity of such events in eukaryotic genomes and the challenge of distinguishing them from background noise. Direct RNA sequencing by Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) permits the direct detection of Us on sequenced RNA reads. Surprisingly, using ONT reads from wild-type (WT) and APOBEC1-knock-out (KO) murine cell lines as well as in vitro synthesized RNA without any modification, we identified a systematic error affecting the accuracy of the Cs call, thereby leading to incorrect identifications of C-to-U events. To overcome this issue in direct RNA reads, here we introduce a novel machine learning strategy based on the isolation Forest (iForest) algorithm in which C-to-U editing events are considered as sequencing anomalies. Using in vitro synthesized and human ONT reads, our model optimizes the signal-to-noise ratio improving the detection of C-to-U editing sites with high accuracy, over 90% in all samples tested. Our results suggest that iForest, known for its rapid implementation and minimal memory requirements, is a promising tool to denoise ONT reads and reliably identify RNA modifications.

Indexed as

RNARNA EditingAnimalsAPOBEC DeaminasesBase SequenceHumansMammalsMiceSequence Analysis, RNAAPOBEC DeaminasesRNAC-to-U editingDirect RNA sequencingiForestRNA editingRNA modifications

Identifiers

PMID38090878
PMCPMC10732634
OpenAlexW4389669882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.