Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090856›Full record

ReviewIEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control2024

Clinical, Safety, and Engineering Perspectives on Wearable Ultrasound Technology: A Review.

Pengfei Song, Michael Andre, Parag Chitnis, Sheng Xu, Theodore Croy, Keith Wear, Siddhartha Sikdar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in Wearable Bioimaging.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pengfei Song
Michael Andre
Parag Chitnis
Sheng Xu
Theodore Croy
Keith Wear
Siddhartha Sikdar

Funding

Sonomyographic Upper Limb Prosthetics: A New ParadigmU01EB027601 · NIBIB · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI KALIKI, RAHUL REDDY, SIKDAR, SIDDHARTHA · 2020 to 2024
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB027601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable ultrasound has the potential to become a disruptive technology enabling new applications not only in traditional clinical settings, but also in settings where ultrasound is not currently used. Understanding the basic engineering principles and limitations of wearable ultrasound is critical for clinicians, scientists, and engineers to advance potential applications and translate the technology from bench to bedside. Wearable ultrasound devices, especially monitoring devices, have the potential to apply acoustic energy to the body for far longer durations than conventional diagnostic ultrasound systems. Thus, bioeffects associated with prolonged acoustic exposure as well as skin health need to be carefully considered for wearable ultrasound devices. This article reviews emerging clinical applications, safety considerations, and future engineering and clinical research directions for wearable ultrasound technology.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyWearable Electronic DevicesEquipment DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID38090856
PMCPMC11416895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.