Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090847›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2024

Center of Mass Estimation for Impaired Gait Assessment Using Inertial Measurement Units.

Gabrielle C Labrozzi, Holly Warner, Nathaniel S Makowski, Musa L Audu, Ronald J Triolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Feasibility of a Center of Mass Based Fuzzy-Logic Phase Detection Algorithm for Post-Spinal Cord Injury Gait.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Plantar flexors are the main engine of walking in healthy adults.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabrielle C Labrozzi
Holly Warner
Nathaniel S Makowski
Musa L Audu
Ronald J Triolo

Funding

Automatic Control of Standing Balance with Functional Neuromuscular StimulationR01NS040547 · NINDS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI AUDU, MUSA L, TRIOLO, RONALD J · 2000 to 2022
$7.2M
Integrated Neural Engineering and Rehabilitation Training ProgramT32EB004314 · NIBIB · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey R Capadona, Robert F. Kirsch · 2004 to 2026
$6.1M
Senior Research Career ScientistIK6RX003844 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RONALD J TRIOLO · 2022 to 2026
–
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004314NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040547RRD VA IK6 RX003844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Injury or disease often compromise walking dynamics and negatively impact quality of life and independence. Assessing methods to restore or improve pathological gait can be expedited by examining a global parameter that reflects overall musculoskeletal control. Center of mass (CoM) kinematics follow well-defined trajectories during unimpaired gait, and change predictably with various gait pathologies. We propose a method to estimate CoM trajectories from inertial measurement units (IMUs) using a bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory neural network to evaluate rehabilitation interventions and outcomes. Five non-disabled volunteers participated in a single session of various dynamic walking trials with IMUs mounted on various body segments. A neural network trained with data from four of the five volunteers through a leave-one-subject out cross validation estimated the CoM with average root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 1.44cm, 1.15cm, and 0.40cm in the mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and inferior/superior (IS) directions respectively. The impact of number and location of IMUs on network prediction accuracy was determined via principal component analysis. Comparing across all configurations, three to five IMUs located on the legs and medial trunk were the most promising reduced sensor sets for achieving CoM estimates suitable for outcome assessment. Lastly, the networks were tested on data from an individual with hemiparesis with the greatest error increase in the ML direction, which could stem from asymmetric gait. These results provide a framework for assessing gait deviations after disease or injury and evaluating rehabilitation interventions intended to normalize gait pathologies.

Indexed as

GaitQuality of LifeBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerWalking

Identifiers

PMID38090847
PMCPMC10849874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.