ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023
Accurate diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid requires multiple health care visits.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical Activity and Risk of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases: A Prospective Cohort Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Prevalence of Genodermatoses in Finland from 1995 to 2022: A Nationwide Registry Study.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Increased Mortality in Patients with Bullous Pemphigoid: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study of 5,738 Patients in Sweden.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Article
- Type 2 Diabetes and its Treatment with Linagliptin are both Associated with Elevated Mortality in Bullous Pemphigoid.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
- Hereditary Angioedema Type 1 and 2 in Finland: Incidence, Prevalence, and Preceding Diagnoses.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate use of diagnostic codes is crucial for epidemiological and genetic research based on electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods: This retrospective study validated the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 diagnostic code L12.0 for bullous pemphigoid (BP) using EHR data from two Finnish university hospitals. We found 1225 subjects with at least one EHR entry of L12.0 between 2009 and 2019. BP diagnosis was based on clinical findings characteristic of BP and positive findings on direct immunofluorescence (DIF), BP180-NC16A enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) assay. Results: True BP was found in 901 patients; the positive predictive value (PPV) for L12.0 was 73.6% (95% CI 71.0-76.0). L12.0 was more accurately registered in dermatology units than any specialized health care units (p<0.001). Including patients with multiple L12.0 registrations (≥3), increased the accuracy of the L12.0 code in both dermatology units and other settings. Discussion: One diagnostic code of L12.0 is not enough to recognize BP in a large epidemiological data set; including only L12.0 registered in dermatology units and excluding cases with <3 L12.0 record entries markedly increases the PPV of BP diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.