ArticleJPRAS open2024
Medial circumflex femoral artery perforator flap to reconstruct a complex rectovaginal fistula: A case report.
Article in JPRAS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstruction of complex rectovaginal fistula is challenging, and it has a high recurrence rate. Traditional reconstruction included a local flap or a myocutaneous flap reconstruction, which is either difficult in radiated cases or that the flap is too thick for flap inset and requires multiple times of revision. Here we report successful rectovaginal fistula repair using a pedicled medial circumflex femoral artery perforator flap (MCFAP). A retrospective chart review was done to collect the information of this 63-year-old female patient who had rectovaginal fistula (RVF) resulting from concurrent radiochemotherapy for cervical cancer. She received direct repair of the RVF, but it recurred. We applied a pedicle perforator flap to successfully repair the defect. The fistula was repaired by separating the posterior vaginal wall from the anterior rectal wall. The anterior wall of the rectum was primarily repaired, leaving a defect of 4 × 5 cm in the posterior vaginal wall. A pedicled MCFAP flap was harvested from her right medial thigh and transferred via a subcutaneous tunnel for reconstruction of the posterior vaginal wall defect. The postoperative course was uneventful. Postoperative gastrointestinal series showed no more RVF, and her colostomy was taken down one year after the reconstruction. This first experience suggests that a pedicle perforator flap can be used successfully for reconstruction of a rectovaginal fistula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.