ArticleNational science review2023
Brain developmental and cortical connectivity changes in transgenic monkeys carrying the human-specific duplicated gene
Article in National science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of human-specific genetic variants on neuronal spinogenesis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Genomic evidence for males of exceptional reproductive output (ERO) in apes and humans.National science review · 2025Article
- Human-specific gene expansions contribute to brain evolution.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Human-specific genetic hallmarks in neocortical development: focus on neural progenitors.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Human-specific genetic modifiers of cortical architecture and function.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2024Review
- Evolutionarily new genes in humans with disease phenotypes reveal functional enrichment patterns shaped by adaptive innovation and sexual selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Evolutionarily new genes in humans with disease phenotypes reveal functional enrichment patterns shaped by adaptive innovation and sexual selection.Research square · 2023Article
- Editorial of non-human primate research.National science review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human-specific duplicated genes contributed to phenotypic innovations during the origin of our own species, such as an enlarged brain and highly developed cognitive abilities. While prior studies on transgenic mice carrying the human-specific
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.