ReviewTranslational lung cancer research2023
The landscape of immune therapy in vulnerable patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.
Review in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitor Rechallenge After Prior Immunotherapy in Patients Aged ≥ 60 Years with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2026Article
- A Prospective Observational Study of Anamorelin During Chemoimmunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Cachexia (SPIRAL-ANA).Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Observational
- From real-world pharmacovigilance data to clinical practice: a geriatric-specific predictive model for immune-related adverse events in lung cancer based on routine clinical indicators.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Bridging FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Clinical Practice: Comprehensive Characterization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Toxicities in Geriatric Lung Cancer Patients.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Impact of vulnerability on concurrent chemoradiotherapy outcomes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using an integrated clinical trial database.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Real-world treatment outcomes before and after chemoimmunotherapy approval in EGFR-mutant NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure: a Japanese cohort study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Prognostic factors affecting mortality in elderly, low body mass index, and poor performance status groups with lung cancer: analysis of the 2016 Korean Association of Lung Cancer Registry (KALC-R) database.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- [A risk prediction model for prognosis and immunotherapy response in prostate cancer patients based on immunosuppressive neutrophil Neu_2 subsets].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in lung cancer patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to substantial advances in the treatment of lung cancer. In particular, the contribution of ICIs to the long-term survival of certain patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. With the accumulated experience in the use of ICIs, numerous studies have documented the efficacy and safety of ICIs in patients with diverse backgrounds, including those with problematic indications for drug therapy. In the current review, we summarize the most recent literature-based findings on ICI administration in vulnerable patients with NSCLC and provide an overview of the current status and prospects of ICIs. Methods: Herein, we defined vulnerable as the group of patients with NSCLC and performance status (PS) ≥2 (poor PS), advanced age (≥75 years), or cancer cachexia. We conducted a narrative review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of ICIs in vulnerable patients with advanced NSCLC. Key Content and Findings: Among the vulnerable patient group, poor PS was a strong, poor prognostic factor, even in patients undergoing ICI therapy. ICI therapy in older patients can be effective, although adverse events (AEs) should be carefully monitored. The efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer cachexia is poor, with further therapeutic development warranted. Conclusions: Although prior studies have evaluated lung cancer pharmacotherapy in various vulnerable populations, clinical studies on the application of ICIs in patients with vulnerable NSCLC are lacking in both number and quality. Further development of these therapeutic agents, with the emergence of additional evidence regarding their appropriate use in this population, is expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.