Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090510›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2023

Comparison of lobectomy performed through Toumai

Jia Huang, Hongda Zhu, Peiji Lu, Jiantao Li, Yu Tian, Yoshiaki Takase, Piergiorgio Muriana, François Montagne, Hao Lin, Long Jiang and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Current state of evidence for RATS lobectomy for NSCLC.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Advances in the application of transoral robotic surgery].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jia Huang *Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hongda Zhu *Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Peiji Lu *Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jiantao Li *Shanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu TianShanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yoshiaki TakaseDivision of General Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Piergiorgio MurianaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
François MontagneDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of Valenciennes, Valenciennes, France.
Hao LinShanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Long JiangShanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qingquan LuoShanghai Lung Tumor Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai Chest Hospital · CNCentre Hospitalier de Valenciennes · FRJichi Medical University · JPSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is a safe and efficient minimally invasive thoracic approach compared to thoracotomy. Today, almost all thoracic procedures can be performed by RATS. In recent years, the Chinese government has issued some policies to support the development of domestic surgical robots, leading to the development of the Toumai Methods: Patients with early-stage NSCLC undergoing robotic-assisted lobectomy in our center between November 2021 and December 2021 were enrolled in the study; Surgeries were performed through the Toumai Results: The combined 19 patients from the Toumai Conclusions: The application of Toumai

Indexed as

da Vinci surgical robotlobectomyNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)robotic-assisted surgeryToumai® surgical robot

Identifiers

PMID38090510
PMCPMC10713264
OpenAlexW4389107838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.