Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090488›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Efficacy and toxicities of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in the second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Szu-Yun Niu, Lou Sun, Shih-Tien Hsu, Sheau-Feng Hwang, Chih-Ku Liu, Yu-Hsiang Shih, Ting-Fang Lu, Yen-Fu Chen, Li-Ching Lai, Pei-Lun Chang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Retrospective Analysis ofJCO precision oncology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Szu-Yun NiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lou SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shih-Tien HsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Sheau-Feng HwangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Ku LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yu-Hsiang ShihDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ting-Fang LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yen-Fu ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Li-Ching LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Pei-Lun ChangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chien-Hsing LuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWChina Medical University · TWChung Shan Medical University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive tumor known for its drug resistance and metastatic potential. The standard first-line treatment typically involves anthracycline-based chemotherapy or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel; however, there is currently no established second-line treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide as a potential second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, single-arm study. We reviewed the tumor registry data from January 2010 to December 2022 and identified patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma who had previously received first-line salvage or adjuvant treatment involving gemcitabine and taxotere, and later experienced tumor recurrence. Patients who met these criteria were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of doxorubicin and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma, as measured by progression-free survival, 1-year overall survival, and response rate. The secondary endpoint was the adverse events associated with this regimen. Results: Fifty-two patients were diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma during the study period, nine of whom were included in the data analysis. All patients had previously received gemcitabine-docetaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy, with a median progression-free survival period of 8.4 months. Doxorubicin-ifosfamide was administered as second-line treatment, with a median progression-free survival of 6.0 months (range: 2.7-79.9 months). The clinical benefit rate of the second-line treatment was 66.7%, with a median overall survival of 33.0 months, and a 1-year overall survival rate of 83.3%. Previous reports have shown that the median progression-free survival for second-line treatments using other regimens ranged from 1.4-5.6 months. The most common adverse event was myelosuppression, with five patients requiring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and one patient requiring a blood transfusion. No patient discontinued treatment due to unmanageable adverse events. Conclusion: Use of doxorubicin with ifosfamide may be a promising and reasonable second-line treatment with manageable adverse events for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapydoxorubicin plus ifosfamidegemcitabine plus docetaxelsecond-line treatmentuterine leiomyosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID38090488
PMCPMC10714004
OpenAlexW4389091448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.