ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Efficacy and toxicities of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in the second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary pulmonary myxoid sarcoma: A case report.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Retrospective Analysis ofJCO precision oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Uterine leiomyosarcoma is a rare and aggressive tumor known for its drug resistance and metastatic potential. The standard first-line treatment typically involves anthracycline-based chemotherapy or a combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel; however, there is currently no established second-line treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin plus ifosfamide as a potential second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, single-center, single-arm study. We reviewed the tumor registry data from January 2010 to December 2022 and identified patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma who had previously received first-line salvage or adjuvant treatment involving gemcitabine and taxotere, and later experienced tumor recurrence. Patients who met these criteria were included in the study. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of doxorubicin and ifosfamide as a second-line treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma, as measured by progression-free survival, 1-year overall survival, and response rate. The secondary endpoint was the adverse events associated with this regimen. Results: Fifty-two patients were diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma during the study period, nine of whom were included in the data analysis. All patients had previously received gemcitabine-docetaxel as first-line adjuvant therapy, with a median progression-free survival period of 8.4 months. Doxorubicin-ifosfamide was administered as second-line treatment, with a median progression-free survival of 6.0 months (range: 2.7-79.9 months). The clinical benefit rate of the second-line treatment was 66.7%, with a median overall survival of 33.0 months, and a 1-year overall survival rate of 83.3%. Previous reports have shown that the median progression-free survival for second-line treatments using other regimens ranged from 1.4-5.6 months. The most common adverse event was myelosuppression, with five patients requiring granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and one patient requiring a blood transfusion. No patient discontinued treatment due to unmanageable adverse events. Conclusion: Use of doxorubicin with ifosfamide may be a promising and reasonable second-line treatment with manageable adverse events for patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.