Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090462›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Needle Arthroscopy as a Promising Alternative to MRI for the Diagnosis of Meniscus Injury.

Tomoyuki Nakasa, Masakazu Ishikawa, Akinori Nekomoto, Kyohei Nakata, Takenori Omoto, Goki Kamei, Atsuo Nakamae, Nobuo Adachi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoyuki NakasaDepartment of Artificial Joints and Biomaterials, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Masakazu IshikawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, JPN.
Akinori NekomotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Kyohei NakataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Takenori OmotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Goki KameiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Atsuo NakamaeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Nobuo AdachiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, JPN.
Kagawa University · JPTakamatsu University · JPHiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meniscal injury is a common cause of knee pain and functional impairment, often necessitating surgical intervention. Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used for diagnosis, its accuracy is variable and may lead to false positives and negatives. To address these issues, needle arthroscopy has gained attention as a potential diagnostic alternative to MRI because of its immediate availability and ability to directly visualize intra-articular structures. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic capabilities of needle arthroscopy in comparison with MRI and diagnostic arthroscopy for meniscal injuries. Forty patients with suspected meniscal injuries requiring surgical treatment were enrolled between November 2017 and March 2019. A needle arthroscope with a 0.95-mm diameter was used to evaluate meniscal injuries. Three orthopaedic surgeons with approximately 10 years of experience independently evaluated the images from the needle arthroscopy, diagnostic arthroscopy, and preoperative MRI without any knowledge regarding patients' information. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each modality were used to compare the diagnostic accuracies. For lateral meniscus (LM) injuries, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of needle arthroscopy compared to diagnostic arthroscopy were 0.706, 0.852, 0.148, and 0.294, respectively. For medial meniscus (MM) injuries, the corresponding values were 0.889, 0.864, 0.136, and 0.111, respectively. In comparison, MRI had a lower sensitivity for LM injuries (0.588) and a higher sensitivity for MM injuries (1.0). The agreement between diagnostic arthroscopy and needle arthroscopy was moderate (kappa=0.517), while the agreements between diagnostic arthroscopy or needle arthroscopy and MRI were poor. Similar patterns were observed for the presence, location, and tear patterns of meniscal injuries. In conclusion, needle arthroscopy shows promise as an effective diagnostic modality for meniscal injuries, surpassing the limitations of MRI.

Indexed as

diagnostic arthroscopyknee pain and functional impairmentmeniscusmrineedle arthroscopysensitivityspecificity

Identifiers

PMID38090462
PMCPMC10714034
OpenAlexW4388613495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.