ArticleCureus2023
Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow Training for Bedside Teaching: A National Survey of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows and Program Directors.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The pediatric emergency department (PED) is a unique fast-paced learning environment. Most pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians work in academic centers and therefore require specific bedside teaching skills to improve and enhance learners' experiences, yet there is no standardized training in bedside teaching for PEM fellows. We aimed to (1) evaluate whether PEM fellowship programs train their fellows to become bedside teachers through a dedicated curriculum and (2) determine how these programs measure curricular effectiveness. Methods In 2022, we developed and disseminated two separate electronic surveys to PEM fellows and PEM fellowship program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) through the American Academy of Pediatrics' Section of Emergency Medicine PEM PD Survey Committee. Results One-third of PEM fellows (32.7%, n=69/211) and PEM PDs/APDs (32.5%, n=26/80) completed the surveys. The majority of fellows (59.4%, n=41/69) and PDs/APDs (76.9%, n=20/26) reported that their programs did not have a formal bedside teaching curriculum. Of the respondents, 81.2% (n=56/69) of fellows and 100% of PDs/APDs believed that their programs prepared fellows to be bedside teachers (p-value=0.04). Most fellows (75.4%, n=52/69) expressed interest in working at an academic medical center, with 19.2% (n=10/52) feeling unprepared to be bedside teachers upon completion of the fellowship. Additionally, 19.2% (n=5/26) PDs/APDs, evaluated their bedside teaching curriculum effectiveness. In addition, the majority of fellows (60.9%, n=42/69) and PDs/APDs (61.5%, n=16/26) described clinical expectations and competing fellowship priorities, respectively, as major barriers to learning bedside teaching. Most PDs/APDs (53.8%, n=14/26) stated that they were uncertain on how to create a bedside teaching curriculum. Conclusions While the majority of PEM fellows plan to be academicians, where they will be expected to teach a variety of learners at the bedside, most PEM fellowship programs do not have dedicated bedside teaching curricula. There is a compelling need to investigate how to encourage and implement bedside teaching education into PEM fellowship curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.