Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090412›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Interventional Radiology for Disease Management: A Narrative Review.

Rasam Mashoufi, Ramin Mashoufi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rasam MashoufiInnovative Medical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad Medical Science, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, IRN.
Ramin MashoufiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, IRN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional radiology (IR) is a branch of radiology that has helped many people who needed extensive surgery. In light of IR's significance in medicine, the main objective of this study was to perform a narrative review of IR uses in illness management. The results of this study were compiled based on the method of conducting review studies. To carry out this study, a systematic search was conducted in international databases, including Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, in the time range of 2000-2023, using relevant keywords. According to the search and considering the necessary criteria to collect the results, 40 articles were selected, and the data was retrieved from them. This study found that IR is useful in obtaining tissue samples for further analysis. Imaging to guide a biopsy is also a widespread practice among interventional radiologists. Previous research has shown that the field of IR/interventional oncology undergoes rapid advancement through the continuous modification of techniques and the development of new treatment methods with minimal invasion. Based on the present study's findings, it can be concluded that IR is an alternative to surgery in some cases and, therefore, can reduce the high cost for patients. In addition, IR reduces the complications related to surgery and the hospitalisation time of patients.

Indexed as

disease managementimaginginterventional oncologyinterventional radiologymagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID38090412
PMCPMC10711338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.