ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2023
Obstetric considerations for aortopathy in pregnancy.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complicated type B aortic dissection in the third trimester of pregnancy.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Navigating the Aortopathy Dilemma in Pregnancy: Case Series Insights From a Cardiac Surgical Center.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Inherited aortopathies and risk of aortic dissection and aortic syndrome in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2026Review
- Multidisciplinary Management of Heritable Aortopathy in Pregnancy Complicated by Postpartum Acute Type A Dissection.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- First-Trimester Aortic Root Replacement in a Pregnant Woman with Previously Undiagnosed Marfan Syndrome.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2026Article
- The approach to chest pain during pregnancy.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection (AD) associated with pregnancy can have catastrophic consequences for the mother and/or fetus. AD occurs in 4-5 per 1,000,000 pregnancies and, despite its rarity, is the third most frequent maternal cardiovascular cause of death. AD associated with pregnancy is most likely to occur in the third trimester or postpartum period. In individuals with genetic aortopathy, pregnancy is considered a high-risk time for AD. There are management strategies in the preconception, antepartum, delivery and postpartum periods to optimize patient care. A multi-disciplinary team that includes capability to perform cardiovascular surgery is critical. Imaging modalities including maternal echocardiogram and magnetic resonance imaging can be safely performed in pregnancy for surveillance of the aortic size. Computed tomography (CT) scan is reserved for scenarios where there is a high index of suspicion for AD in a pregnant person to limit fetal exposure to radiation. After counseling about the potential risks of a pregnancy, the decision to pursue pregnancy is ultimately at the discretion of the individual. The duty of the cardio-obstetric team is to ensure that the patient and their family understand the risks of a pregnancy and the plan of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.