ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2023
The role of sex hormones in abdominal aortic aneurysms: a topical review.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-based differences in cardiovascular risk management and abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Insights from a contemporary cohort study.Atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent Advances in Nanomedicine-Mediated Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Treatment.Small methods · 2025Review
- Sexual Dimorphism in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-Insights from Clinical and Experimental Studies.Journal of vascular diseases · 2025Article
- Global Epidemiology of Early-Onset Aortic Aneurysm: Temporal Trends, Risk Factors, and Future Burden Projections.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Review
- Burden of aortic aneurysm in Iran from 1990 to 2019: an analysis based on global burden of disease study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Current Prognostic Biomarkers for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of the Literature.Biomolecules · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex discrepancies have been reported for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for decades. Men have a higher prevalence of disease, earlier onset, less morphological features obstructing eligibility for repair and better survival, both short and long term. In more recent years, several attempts have been made to identify the biologic or pathogenic factors contributing to these sex differences, including socioeconomic factors though all have failed. The greatest challenge is to reveal the variable mechanism for development of disease for both women and men, and secondly to identify the factors contributing to the progression of disease, and eventual rupture. Evaluations of diagnosed patients have failed to detect any factors associated with development of disease which would give a distinct explanation for the profound sex differences. Considering the obvious earlier trigger for development in men compared to women, excluding smoking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia as certified sole triggers, the remaining factors to explore are sex hormones or biological mechanisms. This topical review explores the contemporary publications on sex hormones and their association with AAA in women and men. The findings confirm the lack of scientific evidence for the influence of female and male sex hormones on development or progression of aneurysm disease. Weak indications support that women probably benefit from a longer reproductive history as a contributing protection against AAA development, influenced by smoking and heredity. There is some evidence that could support that, as for other manifestations of cardiovascular diseases, low testosterone levels in men, can contribute to an increased risk for AAA development. The influence of higher circulating levels of female sex hormones on risk development in men remains to be evaluated. In conclusion, this area will expand during the next decade, by combining registry-based and translational databases in stratified analysis for women and men, giving us more evidence that will contribute to important risk factor estimations for future cohorts at risk of AAA development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.