Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090306›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2023

Health inequities across the lung cancer care continuum in ten marginalized populations: a narrative review.

Shanada Monestime, Maureen Rigney, Nicole Phipps, Chris Carlson, Talia Alongi, Mikayla Redding, Jennifer C King

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Ethnic disparities in survival and progression among EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma of lung cancer patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Disparities in Screening: Can Education Address Imbalance?Annals of thoracic surgery short reports · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shanada MonestimeDepartment of Science and Research, GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.
Maureen RigneyDepartment of Patient and Support Services, GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.
Nicole PhippsDepartment of Patient and Support Services, GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.
Chris CarlsonDepartment of US Consulting FSG, Boston, MA, USA.
Talia AlongiDepartment of US Consulting FSG, Boston, MA, USA.
Mikayla ReddingDepartment of US Consulting FSG, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer C KingDepartment of Science and Research, GO2 for Lung Cancer, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Lung cancer remains the deadliest cancer in the United States. Although lung cancer screening and innovative treatment options are available, accessing these interventions remains a barrier for marginalized communities due to social and structural challenges that influence health care access, which has led to worse outcomes when compared to Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) and non-marginalized populations. The objective of this study is to examine disparities in lung cancer and social/structural factors within ten critical populations (racial/ethnic minorities, low income, rural, LGBTQIA+, women, veteran and active duty, and small cell lung cancer) across the continuum of lung cancer care. Methods: Five databases (PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, and EBSCO Discovery Service) were queried from February 2022-June 2022. The inclusion criteria were (I) peer-reviewed academic journals published in English between the years 2000 and 2022; (II) research that focused on disparities across the lung cancer continuum; and (III) research articles addressing social and structural barriers to lung cancer health care access. A total of 95 articles and 24 reports were used for this narrative review. Key Content and Findings: Across the ten populations, consistent disparities were observed in lung cancer screening and treatment, exhibited by lower uptake in screening, treatment, clinical trials, and biomarker testing. Significant themes contributing to these disparities were socioeconomic status, transportation, language, historic trauma, provider bias or lack of cultural training, and lack of health care access, in part due to insurance coverage. Conclusions: Future studies are needed to further develop meaningful solutions to disparities in health outcomes and access for those who are at risk, diagnosed with, or surviving lung cancer from marginalized populations.

Indexed as

health disparitieshealth equityLung cancermarginalized populationsminorities

Identifiers

PMID38090306
PMCPMC10713295
OpenAlexW4389100843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.