Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090245›Full record

ArticleSultan Qaboos University medical journal2023

Molecular and Clinical Features of Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate

M Sreejisha, M Shalini Shenoy, M Suchitra Shenoy, B Dhanashree, M Chakrapani, K Gopalakrishna Bhat

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M SreejishaDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
M Shalini ShenoyDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
M Suchitra ShenoyDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
B DhanashreeDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
M ChakrapaniDepartment of Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
K Gopalakrishna BhatDepartment of Microbiology, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, (A constituent unit of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal), Karnataka, India.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INKasturba Medical College, Manipal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to detect heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Methods: This study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2020 and included patients admitted in 4 tertiary care hospitals in Karnataka, India. Isolation and identification of MRSA were done using standard bacteriological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion; macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B phenotypes were identified using the D test. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin was determined using agar dilution. hVISA were confirmed by the modified population analysis profile-area under the curve test. SCC Results: Of 220 MRSA stains, 14 (6.4%) were hVISA. None of the MRSA isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all hVISA were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The macrolide-streptogramin B phenotype was present in 42.9% of hVISA; 92.9% of the hVISA strains had vancomycin MIC in the range of 1-2 μg/mL. Majority of the hVISA and vancomycin-susceptible MRSA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. SCC Conclusion: The prevalence rate of hVISA among MRSA was 6.4%. Therefore, MRSA strains should be tested for hVISA before starting vancomycin treatment. None of the isolates was vancomycin-intermediate or -resistant and all the hVISA strains were susceptible to linezolid and teicoplanin. The majority of the hVISA were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections and harboured SCC

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSoft Tissue InfectionsStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansIndiaLinezolidMacrolidesStaphylococcus aureusStreptogramin BTeicoplaninTertiary Care CentersVancomycinVancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsLinezolidMacrolidesStreptogramin BTeicoplaninVancomycinHospital InfectionIndiaMolecular TypingMRSAVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID38090245
PMCPMC10712385
OpenAlexW4361299103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.