Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090191›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery: X2024

Initial real-world experience of clazosentan for subarachnoid hemorrhage in Japan.

Takuma Maeda, Mai Okawara, Manabu Osakabe, Hiroyuki Yamaguchi, Takahiro Maeda, Hiroki Kurita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takuma MaedaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Mai OkawaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital, Muroran, Japan.
Manabu OsakabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital, Muroran, Japan.
Hiroyuki YamaguchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital, Muroran, Japan.
Takahiro MaedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital, Muroran, Japan.
Hiroki KuritaDepartment of Cerebrovascular Surgery, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Japan.
Ohkawara Neurosurgical Hospital · JPSaitama Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebral vasospasm (CVS) is one of the most critical factors associated with clinical outcomes of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Clazosentan has been investigated worldwide as a prophylactic agent to prevent CVS. We evaluated a new CVS management protocol which included clazosentan.

methodsConsecutive 138 patients with SAH, hospitalized in our institution between January 2017 and December 2022, were included in this study. Baseline characteristics, clinical findings, and operative records were analyzed retrospectively. From May 2022, 10 mg/h clazosentan was co-administered with fasudil to all patients according to the indication in the Japanese label. Patients admitted before this date received the conventional combined protocol using the fasudil hydrochloride, nicardipine, and ozagrel.

resultsEighteen (13.0%) patients received the new protocol during the CVS period (defined as day 1 up to day 14 after SAH onset). There were 54 (39.1%) elderly patients aged 75 years or older. Seventy-two (52.2%) patients underwent neurosurgical clipping, whereas 55 (39.9%) patients received endovascular coiling. Among the patients with new protocol, only one patient (5.6%) had symptomatic CVS, compared with 18 patients (15.0%) in those with conventional protocol. More patients who received the new protocol had fluid retention compared with control group (38.9% [7/18] vs. 8.3% [10/120]). Other results did not differ between the two groups.

conclusionsClinical outcomes of the new protocol were comparable to those of conventional protocol. Clazosentan may simplify anti-vasospasm treatment. Fluid retention was a specific side-effect of clazosentan, which requires attention especially in the first half of the CVS period.

Indexed as

Cerebral vasospasm (CVS)ClazosentanElderly patientsPIVLAZSubarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)

Identifiers

PMID38090191
PMCPMC10714223
OpenAlexW4389346450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.