ArticleACS materials Au2023
Reconstruction of Load-Bearing Segmental Bone Defects Using Carbonate Apatite Honeycomb Blocks.
Article in ACS materials Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategic Uniaxial Macropore Sizing for Honeycomb-Structured Scaffolds for Enhanced Bone Reconstruction in Segmental Bone Defects.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advanced structural and compositional profiling of mineral trioxide aggregate incorporated with nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite: a comprehensive X-ray diffraction and energy dispersive X-ray investigation.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
- Innovations in Bioengineering Virtual Special Issue.ACS materials Au · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In a globally aging society, synthetic bone blocks are in increasing demand. An ideal synthetic bone block fuses early with bone and is replaced with new bone at a suitable speed while withstanding the weight load. Herein, we report carbonate apatite honeycomb (HC) blocks with superior mechanical strength, osteoconductivity, and bioresorbability compared to a clinically used synthetic porous block (control block). Three types of HC blocks were fabricated via the debinding of HC green bodies at 600, 650, and 700 °C and subsequent phosphatization, designated as HC-600, HC-650, and HC-700, respectively. The macropores in these HC blocks uniaxially penetrated the blocks, whereas those in the control block were not interconnected. Consequently, the HC blocks exhibited higher open macroporosities (18%-20%) than the control block (2.3%). In contrast, the microporosity of the control block (46.4%) was higher than those of the HC blocks (19%-30%). The compressive strengths of the HC-600, HC-650, HC-700, and control blocks were 24.7, 43.7, 103.8, and 38.9 MPa, respectively. The HC and control blocks were implanted into load-bearing segmental bone defects of rabbit ulnae. Uniaxial HC macropores enabled faster bone ingrowth than the poorly interconnected macropores in the control block. Microporosity in the HC blocks affected bone formation and osteoclastic resorption over a period of 24 weeks. The resorption of HC-650 corresponded to new bone formation; therefore, new bone with strength equal to that of the original bone bridged the separated bones. Thus, the HC blocks achieved the reconstruction of segmental bone defects while withstanding the weight load. The findings of this study contribute to the design and development of synthetic bone blocks for reconstructing segmental defects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.