Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38090057›Full record

ReviewCancer innovation2023

Advances and prospects of drug clinical research in colorectal cancer in 2022.

Dan Su, Chao Liu, Jie Cui, Jiebing Tang, Yuli Ruan, Yanqiao Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer innovation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer: A multidimensional review.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Relationship of FDG PET/CT imaging features with tumor immune microenvironment and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  6. The Role of Transglutaminase 2 in Cancer: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dan SuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.
Jie CuiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.
Jiebing TangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.
Yuli RuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.
Yanqiao ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital Harbin Heilongjiang Province China.ORCID 0000-0002-6206-8364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Clinical research results have provided more treatment opportunities for CRC patients, showing that an optimal combination of existing drugs and new drugs is needed to mitigate the burden of this disease. In this review, we have summarized recent advances in drug clinical research for CRC in 2022, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, to find opportunities for substantial improvements in drug discovery and clinical development methods.

Indexed as

chemotherapycolorectal cancerimmunotherapytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38090057
PMCPMC10686183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.