ArticleHeliyon2023
Predicting priority management areas for land use/cover change in the transboundary Okavango basin based on machine learning.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remote sensing and modelling of land use/land cover (LULC) change is useful to reveal the extent and spatial patterns of landscape changes at various environments and scales. Predicting susceptibility to LULC change is crucial for policy formulation and land management. However, the use of machine learning (ML) for modelling LULC change is limited. This study modelled LULC change susceptibility in the Okavango basin using ML techniques. Areas with high LULC change susceptibility are termed priority management areas (PMAs) in this study. Trajectories of LULC change between 1996 and 2020 are derived from existing LULC change maps of the Okavango basin. Overlay analysis is then used to detect patches of LULC change transitions. Three LULC transitional categories are adopted for modelling PMAs, namely 1) from natural to anthropogenic classes (Category A); 2) from anthropogenic to natural classes (Category B); and 3) from natural to another natural class (Category C). An ensemble of ML algorithms is calibrated with categories of LULC change and social-ecological drivers of change to produce maps showing the susceptibility of LULC change in the basin. Thereafter, thresholding is done on probability maps of susceptibility to LULC change based on the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity (max SSS) to delineate PMAs. Results for trajectories of LULC change indicate that anthropogenic activities (croplands, built-up areas, and barelands) generally expanded, displacing natural areas (wetlands, woodlands, water, and shrubland) from 1996 to 2020. Regarding PMAs, anthropogenic-related PMAs (Category A ∼34 560 km
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.