ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Ten years of incident reports on in-hospital cardiac arrest - Are they useful for improvements?
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-evaluation of ILCORs ten steps to improve around in-hospital cardiac arrests among Swedish hospitals.Resuscitation plus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Staff in hospitals are encouraged to write up incident reports whenever they notice an incident. There are few published compilations of these reports from an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) perspective. Aim: To describe content of incident reports over ten years in a two-sited university hospital in order to share knowledge and thereby being able to improve resuscitation systems in hospitals. Material and methods: All incident reports between 2010-June 2023 written at Karolinska University Hospital contain the words "CPR", "cardiac arrest", "resuscitation", Do-Not-attend-CPR" (DNACPR), "life-sustaining treatment" were included for analysis. Reports were grouped into larger themes. Results: In all 588 reports was identified automatically by the hospitals system based on the totally selected keywords. The largest category was "Life-sustaining treatment" with 178 (30%) reports and thereafter "Preventing care" (117, 20%) and "Material" (80, 14%). Conclusion: Our hospital has clearly valued incident reports as a mean to track on-going issues and serious events over time as well as a source to trigger educational interventions. To improve patient safety, a standardized approach for compilation of reports and actions would be helpful when sharing knowledge between hospitals and with the resuscitation community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.