ArticleFrontiers in plant science2023
Detection of citrus diseases in complex backgrounds based on image-text multimodal fusion and knowledge assistance.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diseases pose a significant threat to the citrus industry, and the accurate detection of these diseases represent key factors for their early diagnosis and precise control. Existing diagnostic methods primarily rely on image models trained on vast datasets and limited their applicability due to singular backgrounds. To devise a more accurate, robust, and versatile model for citrus disease classification, this study focused on data diversity, knowledge assistance, and modal fusion. Leaves from healthy plants and plants infected with 10 prevalent diseases (citrus greening, citrus canker, anthracnose, scab, greasy spot, melanose, sooty mold, nitrogen deficiency, magnesium deficiency, and iron deficiency) were used as materials. Initially, three datasets with white, natural, and mixed backgrounds were constructed to analyze their effects on the training accuracy, test generalization ability, and classification balance. This diversification of data significantly improved the model's adaptability to natural settings. Subsequently, by leveraging agricultural domain knowledge, a structured citrus disease features glossary was developed to enhance the efficiency of data preparation and the credibility of identification results. To address the underutilization of multimodal data in existing models, this study explored semantic embedding methods for disease images and structured descriptive texts. Convolutional networks with different depths (VGG16, ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and ShuffleNetV2) were used to extract the visual features of leaves. Concurrently, TextCNN and fastText were used to extract textual features and semantic relationships. By integrating the complementary nature of the image and text information, a joint learning model for citrus disease features was achieved. ShuffleNetV2 + TextCNN, the optimal multimodal model, achieved a classification accuracy of 98.33% on the mixed dataset, which represented improvements of 9.78% and 21.11% over the single-image and single-text models, respectively. This model also exhibited faster convergence, superior classification balance, and enhanced generalization capability, compared with the other methods. The image-text multimodal feature fusion network proposed in this study, which integrates text and image features with domain knowledge, can identify and classify citrus diseases in scenarios with limited samples and multiple background noise. The proposed model provides a more reliable decision-making basis for the precise application of biological and chemical control strategies for citrus production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.