ArticleArtificial intelligence chemistry2023
Predicting anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities of chemical compounds using machine learning models.
Article in Artificial intelligence chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive hepatotoxicity prediction: ensemble model integrating machine learning and deep learning.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To accelerate the discovery of novel drug candidates for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) therapeutics, we reported a series of machine learning (ML)-based models to accurately predict the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activities of screening compounds. We explored 6 popular ML algorithms in combination with 15 molecular descriptors for molecular structures from 9 screening assays in the COVID-19 OpenData Portal hosted by NCATS. As a result, the models constructed by k-nearest neighbors (KNN) using the molecular descriptor GAFF+RDKit achieved the best overall performance with the highest average accuracy of 0.68 and relatively high average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.74, better than other ML algorithms. Meanwhile, The KNN model for all assays using GAFF+RDKit descriptor outperformed using other descriptors. The overall performance of our developed models was better than REDIAL-2020 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.