ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Establishing clinically meaningful ranges of metal hypersensitivity in orthopaedic patients using COVID-19 vaccine-induced adaptive immune responses from fully vaccinated adults.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess metal sensitization ranges among orthopaedic patients by comparing adaptive immune responses in all-comer pre- and post-operative orthopaedic adults who were COVID-19 unvaccinated or vaccinated vs patients with a painful aseptic implant by lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) to SARS-CoV-2-Spike-Protein (SP) and implant metal(s), respectively. Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed from three independent groups: unvaccinated COVID-19 adults (n = 23); fully COVID-19 vaccinated adults (n = 35); unvaccinated, painful aseptic implant patients with history of metal allergy (n = 98). Standard in vitro LTT for SP and implant metal(s) (nickel, cobalt) were performed and rated as negative (stimulation index [SI]<2), mild (SI ≥ 2), positive (SI ≥ 4-15), and high sensitization (SI > 15) adaptive immune responses to tested antigen. Results: Overall, 17/23 (74%) of unvaccinated adults showed negative to mild LTT ranges, and 35/35 (100%) of vaccinated showed mild to positive LTT ranges to SP. Vaccinated individuals showed significantly higher median SI (16.1) to SP than unvaccinated (median SI, 1.7; Conclusions: Vaccinated adults showed significantly higher lymphocyte SI to SP than unvaccinated indicating that SI ranges ≥4 should be set as unequivocally diagnostic of LTT-positive adaptive immune responses to tested antigen. This analysis supports using higher LTT SI ranges (SI ≥ 4) in diagnosing clinical orthopaedic-related Type IV metal-hypersensitivity responses among orthopaedic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.