ReviewACS materials Au2023
Sodium-Ion Battery: Can It Compete with Li-Ion?
Review in ACS materials Au, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Activation-Induced Turbostratic Ordering in pDCPD-Derived Hard Carbon Enables Stable Carbonate-Based Sodium-Ion Storage.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Challenges in Evaluating Emerging Battery Technologies: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Powering the Future: Unveiling the Potential of Na, K, and Mg Solid-State Batteries.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Progress of MXene-Based Materials in the Field of Rechargeable Batteries.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Nickel-Doped Titanium Oxide with the Rutile Structure for High-Performance Sodium Storage.ACS materials Au · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Strategies for Enhancing the Performance of Polyanionic-Based Sodium-Ion Battery Cathodes.ACS omega · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As concerns about the availability of mineral resources for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) arise and demands for large-scale energy storage systems rapidly increase, non-LIB technologies have been extensively explored as low-cost alternatives. Among the various candidates, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) have been the most widely studied, as they avoid the use of expensive and less abundant elements such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel while also sharing similar operating principles with LIBs. In this Perspective, we discuss why SIBs hold great promise and can act as competitors to lithium-ion technology. In addition, the remaining challenges and future research directions are highlighted, focusing on cathode developments and the use of SIBs in large-scale applications, including electric vehicles and stationary energy storage.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.