Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Recurrent laryngeal never monitoring versus non-monitoring in parathyroid surgery.

Yongliang Mu, Xuehai Bian, Junjie Yang, Yang Li, Yushuai Zhang, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Yishen Zhao, Hui Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongliang Mu *Department of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Xuehai Bian *Department of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Junjie YangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Yang LiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Yushuai ZhangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Gianlorenzo DionigiDivision of Surgery, Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico), Milan, Italy.
Yishen ZhaoDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Hui SunDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine in Surgery, Jilin Provincial Engineering, Laboratory of Thyroid Disease Prevention and Treatment Changchun, Changchun, China.
Jilin University · CNUnion Hospital · CNUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) is well established in thyroid surgery, it is less commonly analyzed in parathyroid operations. This study presents the results of IONM for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism surgery. Methods: We retrospectively assessed 270 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), 53 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), and 300 patients with thyroid cancer from June 2010 to June 2022 in one hospital in China. The follow-up was 12 months. Demographic, electromyography data from IONM, laboratory, and clinical information were collected. Laryngoscopy was collected from 109 patients with PHPT in whom IONM was not used. All groups were assessed by Pearson's chi-square test and Fisher's exact probability method to verify the relationship between parathyroid size and location, duration of surgery, preoperative concordant localization, laryngeal pain, IONM outcomes, cure rate, and RLN injury. Visual analog scale (VAS) assessed laryngeal pain. RLN outcomes were measured according to nerves at risk (NAR). Results: The study comprehended 918 NAR, that is 272, 105, 109, and 432 NAR for PHPT, SHPT with IONM, PHPT without IONM, and thyroid surgery control group, respectively. IONM successfully prevented RLN injury (P<0.001, P=0.012): Fifteen (5.51%) RLNs experienced altered nerve EMG profiles during surgery, and five (1.84%) experienced transient RLN injury in PHPT patients. Five (4.76%) RLNs were found to have altered EMG profiles during surgery, and one (0.95%) RLN had a transient RLN injury in SHPT patients. There was no permanent nerve injury (0.00%) in this series. There was no association between location, gland size, preoperative concordant localization, cure rate, duration of surgery, and IONM (P >0.05). Duration of surgery was associated with postoperative pharyngeal discomfort (P=0.026, P=0.024). Transient RLN injury was significantly lower in patients with PHPT who underwent IONM than in those who did not. Intraoperative neuromonitoring played an effective role in protecting the recurrent laryngeal nerve (P=0.035). Compared with parathyroidectomy, thyroidectomy had a higher rate of RLN injury (5.32%, P<0.001). Conclusion: IONM for SHPT and PHPT offers rapid anatomical gland identification and RLN functional results for effective RLN protection and reduced RLN damage rates.

Indexed as

Hyperparathyroidism, SecondaryRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve InjuriesHumansPainRetrospective StudiesThyroid Glandintraoperative neural monitoringIONMmorbiditypainparathyroidectomyprimary hyperparathyroidismrecurrent laryngeal nervesecondary hyperparathyroidism

Identifiers

PMID38089613
PMCPMC10715272
OpenAlexW4389089906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.