Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089593›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biomedical imaging2023

Segmentation of Dynamic Total-Body [

Maria K Jaakkola, Maria Rantala, Anna Jalo, Teemu Saari, Jaakko Hentilä, Jatta S Helin, Tuuli A Nissinen, Olli Eskola, Johan Rajander, Kirsi A Virtanen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biomedical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Segmentation of Dynamic Total-Body [International journal of biomedical imaging · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria K JaakkolaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-0062
Maria RantalaTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Anna JaloMediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2705-3749
Teemu SaariTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-6906
Jaakko HentiläTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8211-8827
Jatta S HelinMediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5798-4870
Tuuli A NissinenMediCity Research Laboratory, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1763-6083
Olli EskolaRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry Laboratory, Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9874-5662
Johan RajanderAccelerator Laboratory, Turku PET Centre, Abo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3591-0963
Kirsi A VirtanenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jarna C HannukainenTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-4049
Francisco López-PicónTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3871-1735
Riku KlénTurku PET Centre, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-8360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustering time activity curves of PET images have been used to separate clinically relevant areas of the brain or tumours. However, PET image segmentation in multiorgan level is much less studied due to the available total-body data being limited to animal studies. Now, the new PET scanners providing the opportunity to acquire total-body PET scans also from humans are becoming more common, which opens plenty of new clinically interesting opportunities. Therefore, organ-level segmentation of PET images has important applications, yet it lacks sufficient research. In this proof of concept study, we evaluate if the previously used segmentation approaches are suitable for segmenting dynamic human total-body PET images in organ level. Our focus is on general-purpose unsupervised methods that are independent of external data and can be used for all tracers, organisms, and health conditions. Additional anatomical image modalities, such as CT or MRI, are not used, but the segmentation is done purely based on the dynamic PET images. The tested methods are commonly used building blocks of the more sophisticated methods rather than final methods as such, and our goal is to evaluate if these basic tools are suited for the arising human total-body PET image segmentation. First, we excluded methods that were computationally too demanding for the large datasets from human total-body PET scanners. These criteria filtered out most of the commonly used approaches, leaving only two clustering methods,

Identifiers

PMID38089593
PMCPMC10715853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.