ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2024
Towards full-stack deep learning-empowered data processing pipeline for synchrotron tomography experiments.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid acquisition of ionomic and morphological data from plant seeds through fast X-ray fluorescence microscopy and computer vision.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- A versatile framework for attitude tuning of beamlines at light source facilities.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Review
- StreamSAXS: a Python-based workflow platform for processing streaming SAXS/WAXS data.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2024Article
- A step towards 6D WAXD tensor tomography.IUCrJ · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Synchrotron tomography experiments are transitioning into multifunctional, cross-scale, and dynamic characterizations, enabled by new-generation synchrotron light sources and fast developments in beamline instrumentation. However, with the spatial and temporal resolving power entering a new era, this transition generates vast amounts of data, which imposes a significant burden on the data processing end. Today, as a highly accurate and efficient data processing method, deep learning shows great potential to address the big data challenge being encountered at future synchrotron beamlines. In this review, we discuss recent advances employing deep learning at different stages of the synchrotron tomography data processing pipeline. We also highlight how applications in other data-intensive fields, such as medical imaging and electron tomography, can be migrated to synchrotron tomography. Finally, we provide our thoughts on possible challenges and opportunities as well as the outlook, envisioning selected deep learning methods, curated big models, and customized learning strategies, all through an intelligent scheduling solution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.