Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089540›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023

Benefit of Prompt Vs Delayed Initiation of Triple Therapy Following an Exacerbation in Patients with COPD in Japan: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Alexandrosz Czira, Shoko Akiyama, Takeo Ishii, Robert P Wood, Lucinda J Camidge, Hannah Wallis, Thomas Jennison, Rosie A C Wild, Masao Yarita, Kenichi Hashimoto and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Prompt versus Delayed Triple Therapy in COPD: Solutions to Time-Related Biases in Observational Studies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandrosz CziraValue Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3395-6186
Shoko AkiyamaValue Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-6089
Takeo IshiiValue Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6865-1967
Robert P WoodReal-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-435X
Lucinda J CamidgeReal-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8056-054X
Hannah WallisReal-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-2317
Thomas JennisonReal-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7455-4442
Rosie A C WildReal-World Evidence, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9963-6441
Masao YaritaValue Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5770-4496
Kenichi HashimotoValue Evidence and Outcomes, Japan Medical and Development, GSK, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-4224
Kieran J RothnieValue Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Brentford, Middlesex, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4279-1624
Afisi S IsmailaValue Evidence and Outcomes, R&D Global Medical, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2876-8308
Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There is currently limited evidence for the optimal timing of triple therapy initiation in Japan, which is crucial for optimizing strategies for the effective treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study assessed the impact of prompt vs delayed initiation of triple therapy following a COPD exacerbation on clinical and economic outcomes in patients in Japan. Patients and Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients in the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database initiating triple therapy as single-inhaler triple therapy (fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol or budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy within 180 days of a moderate-to-severe exacerbation (index). For the main analysis, patients were categorized as prompt or delayed initiators, initiating triple therapy within 0-30 days or 31-180 days of index, respectively. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores was used to adjust for measured confounders between prompt and delayed cohorts. Results: For the main analysis, 610 (60.3%) and 402 (39.7%) patients were prompt and delayed initiators, respectively. The rate of subsequent moderate-to-severe exacerbations following index exacerbation was numerically lower in prompt vs delayed initiators (weighted rate ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-1.21; Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrated that earlier initiation of triple therapy resulted in several benefits in clinical outcomes for COPD and may also reduce the economic burden of COPD management in Japan.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug CombinationsHumansJapanRetrospective StudiesBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationDrug Combinationsdirect medical costshealthcare resource utilizationhospital readmissionsinverse probability of treatment weightingmultiple inhaler triple therapysingle inhaler triple therapy

Identifiers

PMID38089540
PMCPMC10715027
OpenAlexW4389484537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.