Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089487›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2023

An uncommon problem: Overcoming the challenges of rectal foreign bodies-A case series and literature review.

Ghodratollah Maddah, Abbas Abdollahi, Alireza Tavassoli, Mohammad Taghi Rajabi Mashhadi, Ali Mehri, Mohammad Etezadpour

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ghodratollah MaddahEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Abbas AbdollahiEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Alireza TavassoliEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Mohammad Taghi Rajabi MashhadiEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Ali MehriEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8989-974X
Mohammad EtezadpourEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center Mashhad University of Medical Sciences Mashhad Iran.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key Clinical Message: Although rectal foreign bodies are rare presentations, this condition should be considered in patients with preanal pain, lower pelvic pain, or rectal bleeding. Abstract: Rectal foreign bodies are a rare occurrence and can pose a therapeutic challenge for surgeons. These objects may be inserted through the anus or ingested orally. This study presents a retrospective review of all cases of trapped rectal foreign bodies at a single university hospital. From 2001 to 2020, twelve cases of rectal foreign bodies were diagnosed and treated at Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad. Demographic information, type of foreign body, clinical presentation, and removal method were collected retrospectively. All cases of rectal foreign bodies entered through the anus. Twelve cases involved male patients, with a mean age of 47.5 years (ranging from 24 to 70 years), and two cases involved female patients, with a mean age of 29.5 years (ranging from 29 to 30 years). Patients' main complaint was defecation disorder, accounting for 57% of cases. The types of rectal foreign bodies included two body sprays, two wood pieces, two glass bottles, glasses, eggplants, cucumbers, squash, and anal dilators. One case involved surgical gas. In five cases, rectal foreign bodies were removed under general anesthesia through the rectum by dilatation. Rectal foreign bodies were removed by rectosigmoidoscopy in three cases, forceps in two cases, and abdominal maneuvers in one case. Only one case required laparotomy. Minor complications such as scratches or small mucosal tears were observed in some cases after removal of the foreign body, but no deaths were reported. Although rectal foreign bodies are rare, this condition should be considered in patients with preanal pain, lower pelvic pain, or rectal bleeding when no justification for recent endoscopic examinations is found. Most rectal foreign bodies are removed through the anus under appropriate anesthesia. Rectosigmoidoscopy is a good alternative if needed. Surgical measures are necessary for cases that lead to peritonitis or are likely to cause serious injury.

Indexed as

colorectal surgeryforeign bodiessurgical approachtrauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID38089487
PMCPMC10714057
OpenAlexW4389608776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.