ArticleJAAD international2024
Development and validation of a deep learning model for improving detection of nonmelanoma skin cancers treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Article in JAAD international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of an artificial intelligence model for basal cell carcinoma detection and section completeness assessment in Mohs micrographic surgery in an Asian cohort.JAAD international · 2026Article
- The State of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in 2025-2026: Current Challenges, Pressures, and the Path Forward.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2026Review
- Intraoperative Margin Control in Eyelid Tumor Surgery: Current Standards, Imaging Advances, and Emerging Techniques.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Mini review on skin biopsy: traditional and modern techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Real-time review of frozen sections underpins the quality of Mohs surgery. There is an unmet need for low-cost techniques that can improve Mohs surgery by reliably corroborating cancerous regions of interest and surgical margin proximity. Objective: To test that deep learning models can identify nonmelanoma skin cancer regions in Mohs frozen section specimens. Methods: Deep learning models were developed on archival images of focused microscopic views (FMVs) containing regions of annotated, invasive nonmelanoma skin cancer between 2015 and 2018, then validated on prospectively collected images in a temporal cohort (2019-2021). Results: The tile-based classification models were derived using 1423 focused microscopic view images from 154 patients and tested on 374 images from 66 patients. The best models detected basal cell carcinomas with a median average precision of 0.966 and median area under the receiver operating curve of 0.889 at 100x magnification (0.943 and 0.922 at 40x magnification). For invasive squamous cell carcinomas, high median average precision of 0.904 was achieved at 100x magnification. Limitations: Single institution study with limited cases of squamous cell carcinoma and rare nonmelanoma skin cancer. Conclusion: Deep learning appears highly accurate for detecting skin cancers in Mohs frozen sections, supporting its potential for enhancing surgical margin control and increasing operational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.