Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089395›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2019

Collaborative mentoring for effective medical research groups.

Rodrigo Enrique Elizondo-Omaña, Pablo Patricio Zarate-Garza, Guillermo Jacobo-Baca, Yolanda Salinas-Alvarez, Bernardo Alfonso Fernandez-Rodarte, Javier Humberto Martinez-Garza, Alejandro Quiroga-Garza, Santos Guzman-Lopez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Research barriers in the Global South: Mexico.Journal of global health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodrigo Enrique Elizondo-OmañaUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Pablo Patricio Zarate-GarzaUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Guillermo Jacobo-BacaUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Yolanda Salinas-AlvarezUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Bernardo Alfonso Fernandez-RodarteUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Javier Humberto Martinez-GarzaUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Alejandro Quiroga-GarzaUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.
Santos Guzman-LopezUniversidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Research benefits professors and students, mentors and mentees, however, many Universities lack formal programs, especially in basic sciences such as anatomy. Faculty, many times, lack the time, resources, and a well-structured program. Mentoring and collaborative work, have played an important role in creating an effective environment that inspires its members into scientific production, enhances research skills, while gaining experience. The authors presented a student anatomy research group (Grupo de Investigación en Anatomía [GIA]) model that integrates faculty from basic and clinical fields through a collaborative mentoring and tightly organized structure that increases training, experience, and scientific output. The transformation stages described shows the progress, reporting the fundamental elements for integration of the model, with results presented at 16 years of experience of the group in the Anatomy department. Results evidence a steady increase in student/professor involvement, scientific publishing, presentations in meetings (national/international), and cites.

Indexed as

academic medicineanatomy research groupcollaborative mentoringmedical research groupmentoringresearch mentoring.undergraduate students

Identifiers

PMID38089395
PMCPMC10712473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.