Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089325›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2019

Transforming your daily work into scholarship: Tips for a busy clinician-scholar.

Sarina Schrager, Susan Pollart, Elizabeth Sadowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 78% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarina SchragerUniversity of Wisconsin.
Susan PollartUniversity of Virginia.
Elizabeth SadowskiUniversity of Wisconsin.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Academic faculty are pulled in multiple directions during their daily work life. Clinical issues, teaching responsibilities, and administrative duties all take up large amounts of time. At the same time, most faculty have requirements for scholarly activities for promotions. This paper discusses ways that individuals can use much of the work that they do in all of the realms of their jobs and turn it into scholarly projects. By focusing the content of their work, planning ahead, and making everything count twice, faculty can be successful in developing scholarship using their daily work.

Indexed as

Faculty developmentscholarly activity

Identifiers

PMID38089325
PMCPMC10712472
OpenAlexW2990408081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.