Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089237›Full record

ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2018

The use of quality assurance instruments and methods to integrate diversity aspects into health professions study programmes.

Sabine Ludwig, Yadira Roa Romero, Johanna Balz, Mandy Petzold

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diversity in Medical Education.GMS journal for medical education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabine LudwigCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Yadira Roa RomeroCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Johanna BalzCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
Mandy PetzoldCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Background With the increasing diversity in our population, future medical doctors need to have adequate diversity and gender competencies in order to provide adequate and good quality of medical care. Diversity, especially sex and gender aspects, were therefore systematically integrated into the new modular medical curriculum at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin. The aim was to integrate diversity aspects into further study programmes of the Charité Berlin by assessing the current degree of integration and the relevance for the professional work of students and graduates and identifying suitable and effective quality assurance instruments. Methods After the curriculum development of the new modular medical curriculum was completed, the gender and diversity change agent was transferred from the curriculum development team to the quality assurance section of the Office of the Dean of Student Affairs. The change agent identified in cooperation with the quality assurance team the accreditation process, student evaluations and graduate surveys as suitable methods for the integration. Furthermore, the change agent provided support to the programme directors and coordinators with the integration. The impact of the measures and instruments used for the integration are measured within the reaccredition process of the programmes. Results Diversity aspects could be integrated into the accreditation standards admission, curricular structure, didactics, assessment and student counselling. In the student evaluations and graduate surveys gender and diversity items like migration background, number of children, caring responsibilities, disabilities and economic status could be integrated. Furthermore, students and graduates were asked to evaluate the relevance of gender and diversity competencies for their professional work and the degree of the curricular integration. Discussion and Conclusion The impact of the integrated diversity aspects can only be evaluated within the accreditation process. In order to increase and improve the awareness of students and faculty members of diversity aspects and issues the support by a gender and diversity change agent with the integration and by lecturing on this subject is important. A gender and diversity sensitive accreditation process contributes to the reflexivity and awareness of the faculty members involved.

Indexed as

AccreditationDiversityEvaluationGenderQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID38089237
PMCPMC10711966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.