Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38089166›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Use and perceptions of digital technology for daily life, physical activity and health information among former cardiac rehabilitation patients in Austria: A cross-sectional survey.

Hannah McGowan, Johanna Gutenberg, Veronika Leitner, Kathrin Mühlhauser, Aliz Breda, Michael Fischer, Sebastian Globits, Vincent Grote, David Kiesl, Karl Mayr and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah McGowanLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-1631
Johanna GutenbergLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.
Veronika LeitnerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.
Kathrin MühlhauserLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.
Aliz BredaReha-Klinik Montafon, Schruns, Austria.
Michael FischerVAMED Rehabilitation Center Kitzbühel, Kitzbühel, Austria.
Sebastian GlobitsHerz-Kreislauf-Zentrum Groß Gerungs, Groß Gerungs, Austria.
Vincent GroteLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Rehabilitation Research, Wien, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4421-2449
David KieslCARDIOMED Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Linz, Austria.
Karl MayrCARDIOMED Cardiac Rehabilitation Center, Linz, Austria.
Michael MunteanHumanomed Center Althofen, Althofen, Austria.
Andrea PodolskyInstitute of Preventive and Applied Sports Medicine, University Hospital Krems, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
Josef NiebauerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.
Rik CrutzenLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.
Stefan Tino KulnikLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5419-6713
Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH · ATLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Prevention · ATMaastricht University · NLJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Digital health technologies offer great potential to improve access and adherence to cardiovascular disease secondary prevention measures such as regular physical activity (PA). However, the use and perceptions of digital technology (DT) among cardiac rehabilitation (CR) patients are not well understood. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the use of DT in former CR patients' daily lives, for PA and for health information; and to gain insight into patient perceptions of DT for PA, including barriers, facilitators and requested features. Methods: A cross-sectional postal survey was conducted between May 2022 and January 2023. Five Austrian CR centres contacted 500 former patients who had completed a phase 2 CR programme from January 2019 onwards. One-hundred seventeen patients (mean [SD] age, 69 ± 10 years, 22% female) responded. Descriptive and thematic analyses were conducted for closed and open-ended questions, respectively. Results: Results indicated high DT usage for communication and informational aspects, and to a large extent also for PA and health information seeking. Main facilitators of DT use for PA were attributed to health and behavioural monitoring. Main barriers were lack of perceived need, lack of interest and poor usability. Most frequently requested features included pulse and blood pressure measurement, step count and compatibility to other devices. Conclusions: Patients generally used and perceived DT as beneficial in daily life and for secondary prevention purposes such as PA. The survey identified facilitators, barriers and feature requests, which may inform the design and implementation of digital health interventions for CR patients.

Indexed as

Barrierscardiovascular diseasedata protectiondigital health literacyfacilitatorssecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID38089166
PMCPMC10714890
OpenAlexW4389577970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.