Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38088996›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2024

Comparative Assessment of Physiological Responses to Emotional Elicitation by Auditory and Visual Stimuli.

Edoardo M Polo, Andrea Farabbi, Maximiliano Mollura, Alessia Paglialonga, Luca Mainardi, Riccardo Barbieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edoardo M PoloDEIBPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0432-1314
Andrea FarabbiDEIBPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5582-4654
Maximiliano MolluraDEIBPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-8145
Alessia PaglialongaCnr-Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni (CNR-IEIIT) 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1341-2560
Luca MainardiDEIBPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6276-6314
Riccardo BarbieriDEIBPolitecnico di Milano 20133 Milan Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9381-3833
Politecnico di Milano · ITInstitute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of emotions through the analysis of the induced physiological responses gained increasing interest in the past decades. Emotion-related studies usually employ films or video clips, but these stimuli do not give the possibility to properly separate and assess the emotional content provided by sight or hearing in terms of physiological responses. In this study we have devised an experimental protocol to elicit emotions by using, separately and jointly, pictures and sounds from the widely used International Affective Pictures System and International Affective Digital Sounds databases. We processed galvanic skin response, electrocardiogram, blood volume pulse, pupillary signal and electroencephalogram from 21 subjects to extract both autonomic and central nervous system indices to assess physiological responses in relation to three types of stimulation: auditory, visual, and auditory/visual. Results show a higher galvanic skin response to sounds compared to images. Electrocardiogram and blood volume pulse show different trends between auditory and visual stimuli. The electroencephalographic signal reveals a greater attention paid by the subjects when listening to sounds compared to watching images. In conclusion, these results suggest that emotional responses increase during auditory stimulation at both central and peripheral levels, demonstrating the importance of sounds for emotion recognition experiments and also opening the possibility toward the extension of auditory stimuli in other fields of psychophysiology. Clinical and Translational Impact Statement- These findings corroborate auditory stimuli's importance in eliciting emotions, supporting their use in studying affective responses, e.g., mood disorder diagnosis, human-machine interaction, and emotional perception in pathology.

Indexed as

EmotionsSoundAcoustic StimulationHearingHumansMood DisordersBiomedical signal processingemotion elicitationinternational affective digital sounds (IADS)international affective pictures system (IAPS)physiological responses

Identifiers

PMID38088996
PMCPMC10712661
OpenAlexW4387587727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.