Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38088953›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2023

Summary of the NACI Statement on Public Health Level Recommendations on the Use of Pneumococcal Vaccines in Adults, Including the Use of 15-valent and 20-valent Conjugate Vaccines.

Aleksandra Wierzbowski, Robert Pless, Kyla J Hildebrand

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost effectiveness of a 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in adults: A systematic review of economic evaluations.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  6. Comparison of 13-, 15- and 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in the paediatric Canadian population: A cost-utility analysis.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra WierzbowskiCentre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Robert PlessCentre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Kyla J HildebrandNACI Pneumococcal Working Group Chair, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Age and certain medical/social conditions are risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). For prevention of IPD, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has recommended the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine, PNEU-P-23, for adults 65 years of age and older and adults over 18 years of age living with certain underlying conditions. NACI has also recommended 13-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine, PNEU-C-13, for adults; however, in publicly funded programs, this recommendation is limited to individuals with risk factors for IPD. Two new conjugate vaccines, PNEU-C-15 and PNEU-C-20, have been authorized by Health Canada for prevention of IPD in adults. This article summarizes NACI public health recommendations for pneumococcal vaccines in adults given these new conjugate vaccines that provide additional serotype coverage over PNEU-C-13. Methods: Key studies evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of PNEU-C-15 and PNEU-C-20 were reviewed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Results: The PNEU-C-15 and PNEU-C-20 vaccines showed comparable immune responses, and safety profiles for all mild, moderate, and severe adverse events, to the currently used vaccines. No data were available on the efficacy or effectiveness of PNEU-C-15 or PNEU-C-20. Economic evidence and feasibility assessments supported the use of the PNEU-C-20 vaccine. Conclusion: NACI recommends PNEU-C-20 for adults 65 years of age and older, 50-64 years of age and living with factors placing them at higher risk of pneumococcal disease, and 18-49 years of age with immunocompromising conditions, with PNEU-C-15+PNEU-P-23 an alternative.

Indexed as

economic analysisimmunization scheduleinvasive pneumococcal diseasepneumococcal infectionpneumococcal vaccinespublic health recommendationsvaccines/conjugate

Identifiers

PMID38088953
PMCPMC10715826
OpenAlexW4323546357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.