Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38088726›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2023

MANAGEMENT OF SYMPTOMS RECURRENCE AFTER MYOTOMY FOR ACHALASIA. A PRACTICAL APPROACH.

Francisco Tustumi, Sérgio Szachnowicz, Nelson Adami Andreollo, Francisco Carlos Bernal da Costa Seguro, Edno Tales Bianchi, André Fonseca Duarte, Ary Nasi, Rubens Antonio Aissar Sallum

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ADVANCED MEGAESOPHAGUS TREATMENT: WHICH TECHNIQUE OFFERS THE BEST RESULTS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco TustumiUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-0496
Sérgio SzachnowiczUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-3532
Nelson Adami AndreolloUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Department of Surgery - Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-1165
Francisco Carlos Bernal da Costa SeguroUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4180-9258
Edno Tales BianchiUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9643-2622
André Fonseca DuarteUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3332-0567
Ary NasiUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6928-4281
Rubens Antonio Aissar SallumUniversidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1823-0042
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAchalasia is an esophageal motility disorder, and myotomy is one of the most used treatment techniques. However, symptom persistence or recurrence occurs in 9 to 20% of cases.

aimsThis study aims to provide a practical approach for managing the recurrence or persistence of achalasia symptoms after myotomy.

methodsA critical review was performed to gather evidence for a rational approach for managing the recurrence or persistence of achalasia symptoms after myotomy.

resultsTo properly manage an achalasia patient with significant symptoms after myotomy, such as dysphagia, regurgitation, thoracic pain, and weight loss, it is necessary to classify symptoms, stratify severity, perform appropriate tests, and define a treatment strategy. A systematic differential diagnosis workup is essential to cover the main etiologies of symptoms recurrence or persistence after myotomy. Upper digestive endoscopy and dynamic digital radiography are the main tests that can be applied for investigation. The treatment options include endoscopic dilation, peroral endoscopic myotomy, redo surgery, and esophagectomy, and the decision should be based on the patient's individual characteristics.

conclusionsA good clinical evaluation and the use of proper tests jointly with a rational assessment, are essential for the management of symptoms recurrence or persistence after achalasia myotomy.

Indexed as

Esophageal AchalasiaMyotomyDeglutition DisordersEndoscopyEsophageal Sphincter, LowerEsophagectomyHumansNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38088726
PMCPMC10712922
OpenAlexW4389495215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.