Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38088681›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2023

Pediatricians' focus of sight at pain assessment during a neonatal heel puncture.

Erica Souza Silva, Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros, Julia Baptista Lopes Borten, Lucas Pereira Carlini, Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda, Rafael Nobre Orsi, Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich, Carlos Eduardo Thomaz, Ruth Guinsburg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Physicians' eye-tracking in neonatal intensive care: evaluating a mechanical ventilator panel.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erica Souza SilvaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal - São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-3417
Marina Carvalho de Moraes BarrosUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal - São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-3474
Julia Baptista Lopes BortenUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal - São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3835-8406
Lucas Pereira CarliniCentro Universitario FEI, Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens - São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0999-186X
Rita de Cássia Xavier BaldaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal - São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7553-466X
Rafael Nobre OrsiCentro Universitario FEI, Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens - São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4719-0131
Tatiany Marcondes HeiderichCentro Universitario FEI, Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens - São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-7719
Carlos Eduardo ThomazCentro Universitario FEI, Departamento de Engenharia Elétrica, Laboratório de Processamento de Imagens - São Bernardo do Campo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5566-1963
Ruth GuinsburgUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Disciplina de Pediatria Neonatal - São Paulo, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-9861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the focus of pediatricians' gaze during the heel prick of neonates.

methodsProspective study in which pediatricians wearing eye tracker glasses evaluated neonatal pain before/after a heel prtick. Pediatricians scored the pain they perceived in the neonate in a verbal analogue numerical scale (0=no pain; 10=maximum pain). The outcomes measured were number and time of visual fixations in upper face, lower face, and hands, in two 10-second periods, before (pre) and after the puncture (post). These outcomes were compared between the periods, and according to pediatricians' pain perception: absent/mild (score: 0-5) and moderate/intense (score: 6-10).

results24 pediatricians (31 years old, 92% female) evaluated 24 neonates. The median score attributed to neonatal pain during the heel prick was 7.0 (Interquartile range: 5-8). Compared to pre-, in the post-periods, more pediatricians fixed their gaze on the lower face (63 vs. 92%; p=0.036) and the number of visual fixations was greater on the lower face (2.0 vs. 5.0; p=0.018). There was no difference in the number and time of visual fixations according to the intensity of pain.

conclusionsAt bedside, pediatricians change their focus of attention on the neonatal face after a painful procedure, focusing mainly on the lower part of the face.

Indexed as

HeelPuncturesAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePainPain MeasurementProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38088681
PMCPMC10712942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.