ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2024
Comparative analysis of a rapid diagnostic test and scoring tools for ESBL detection in
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Community-associated quinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producingmSystems · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the quickmic system in the rapid diagnosis of Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia.Microbiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Is It Safe to Treat Stable Patients with Bacteremic Urinary Tract Infections with High-Resistant-Rate Antibiotics?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The genotypic antibiogram: using gram-negative antimicrobial resistance genes identified via rapid blood culture identification tests to optimize treatment of Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
importanceOur study addresses a significant issue in the medical and scientific community-the delayed administration of appropriate antimicrobial treatments due to the time-consuming process of phenotypic susceptibility data collection in gram-negative bloodstream infections. Our research indicates that a multiplex PCR rapid diagnostic test (RDT) significantly outperformed two clinical scoring tools in predicting ceftriaxone susceptibility. Multiplex PCR also led to reduced instances of undertreatment with ceftriaxone and minimized overtreatment with carbapenems. Furthermore, multiplex PCR demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in predicting ceftriaxone susceptibility. The results of our study underscore the potential RDTs to reduce the time to appropriate antimicrobial therapy, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.