ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2023
The Need for Vestibular Implants in a Tertiary Referral Ear, Nose, and Throat Center and Its Relation to Hearing Status.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) are at increased risk of falling and have poor quality of life. Several research groups are currently developing and investigating vestibular implants to treat BVP. The goal was to identify how many patients can be considered eligible for vestibular implantation.
methodsThe objective vestibular implantation criteria for research were applied to the results of the caloric irrigation test, the sinusoidal harmonic acceleration test, the video head impulse test, and the cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential tests.
resultsVestibular implant eligibility was situated between 3.6% and 15.7% (semicircular canal implant: 3.6%; otolith implant: 15.7%; combined implant: 4.8%). Only 16 out of the 29 patients (55%) eligible for a vestibular implant had bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss. The remaining 45% (13/29) thus have better hearing in at least 1 ear.
conclusionVestibular implant eligibility in an ear, nose, and throat department was situated between 3.6% and 15.7%, depending on the type of implant that was considered. In addition, the data showed that 45% of the eligible patients had normal-to-moderate hearing in at least 1 ear. In other words, only recruiting patients with (bilateral) severe-to-profound hearing loss for vestibular implantation leads to the systematic exclusion of about half of the candidates. Structure-preserving surgical techniques are thus a major future challenge in the field of vestibular implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.