ArticleJournal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials2024
Exploring the mechanical properties of 3D-printed multilayer lattice structures for use in accommodative insoles.
Article in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Durability and offloading performance of 3D-printed multilayer lattice for accommodative insoles.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026Article
- Pathways of load transfer in custom accommodative insoles for people with diabetes.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2025Article
- Effects of standard of care and pressure-based 3D-printed custom accommodative insoles on static balance in individuals with diabetes: A pilot study.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2025Article
- From Design to Clinical Translation: Unraveling Orthotist Perspectives on 3D Printed Accommodative Insoles.Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Full-contact insoles fabricated from multilayer foams are the standard of care (SoC) for offloading and redistributing high plantar pressures in individuals with diabetes at risk of plantar ulceration and subsequent lower limb amputation. These devices have regional variations in total thickness and layer thickness to create conformity with a patient's foot. Recent work has demonstrated that metamaterials can be tuned to match the mechanical properties of SoC insole foams. However, for devices fabricated using a multilayer lattice structure, having regional variations in total thickness and layer thickness may result in regional differences in mechanical properties that have yet to be investigated. Three lattices, two dual-layer and one uniform-layer lattice structure, designed to model the mechanical properties of SoC insoles, were 3D-printed at three structure/puck thicknesses representing typical regions seen in accommodative insoles. The pucks underwent cyclic compression testing, and the stiffness profiles were assessed. Three pucks at three structure/puck thicknesses fabricated from SoC foams were also tested. Initial evaluations suggested that for the latticed pucks, structure thickness and density inversely impacted puck stiffness. Behaving most like the SoC pucks, a dual-layer lattice that increased in density as structure thickness increased demonstrated consistent stiffness profiles across puck thicknesses. Identifying a lattice with constant mechanical properties at various structure thicknesses may be important to produce a conforming insole that emulates the standard of care from which patient-specific/regional lattice modulations can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.